四分律行事鈔資持記 1.482

1.482

In refuting the ancient [interpretations], it first indicates the present differs from the ancient. "Therefore..." cites text to question the error. "If..." provisionally retains the old interpretation. Thus it says "both are tenable." However, not rebuking may be acceptable, but if one does rebuke, then it is not established; if one takes it from the word "completed," there is no such impediment. Below it refers to the Commentary on Meanings, which is in the section on the timing of generating the precepts in the upper fascicle; that also takes the word "completed," and the text there is not extensive; looking at and comparing them, it can be seen.