四分比丘戒本疏 2.29

2.29

第二十三、從非親乞縷并使非親織作衣戒。詳此戒意，一以多緣妨道、二以招譏、三以損他集而成過。乞縷營造是多緣，從非親乞是招譏，准《十誦》、《薩婆多》恃勢令織不與價直是損他。於三事中隨闕，即不犯捨，猶如自乞作房有過量罪等也。第二十四、知他擬施屏勸好織戒。第二十五、覆求贈衣不遂還奪戒。光綩云「元與衣不分，明強奪戒。」舊人但名先與他衣後奪戒者，並太隱也。准律文中，先與他衣，內覆求心，親欲人間共行教化：他後不去，嗔恚還奪。即是不定與、決定取而却奪犯也。定與定取、定與不定取，此二却奪，即犯重罪。若俱不定，奪犯吉羅。

The twenty-third precept: on begging yarn from an unrelated person and having an unrelated person weave it into a robe. Examining the purpose of this precept: first, excessive involvements obstruct the path; second, it incurs ridicule; third, it causes harm to others; these combine to form the fault. Begging for yarn and managing its production constitutes excessive involvements; begging from an unrelated person incurs ridicule; and according to the *Daśabhāṇavāra-vinaya* and the *Sarvāstivāda-śāstra*, relying on influence to make someone weave without paying the price constitutes harming others. If any of these three matters is absent, one does not commit an offence of forfeiture, just as when begging to construct a hut oneself, there is the fault of exceeding the measurements, and so forth. The twenty-fourth precept: on secretly encouraging better weaving knowing that another intends to donate. The twenty-fifth precept: on taking back a gifted robe when a covert request is thwarted. Guangtong said: “Originally giving the robe without division, this clarifies the precept on forcibly taking it back.” Old masters merely called it the precept on first giving a robe to another and later taking it back, which is far too obscure. According to the text of the Vinaya, one first gives a robe to another while harbouring an inward wish to make a covert request, wanting him to go along into the human realm to carry out conversions together; when the other person subsequently does not go, one becomes angry and takes it back. That is to say, it is an offence of taking back where there was indefinite giving and definite taking. If there was definite giving and definite taking, or definite giving and indefinite taking, in both of these cases taking it back incurs a grave offence. If both were indefinite, taking it back incurs a duṣkṛta.