四分比丘戒本疏 2.44

2.44

第十二、文言「妄作異語惱他」者，假託餘事名之為妄也。如《僧祇》十四「問云：汝從何來？答云：過去中來。何處去？答：未來世中去。如是不正答者，名為異語」也。准律，闡陀輕陵餘人，作此異語，犯突吉羅。佛教比丘作單白法，名作異語。作白已後若更犯者，即犯提罪。闡陀餘日又作惱僧，僧喚不來、不喚即來，應語不語、不應語便語。作此非理，名為惱他也。又制作白，名作惱他，結罪准前。此即兩戒合制也。

Twelfth: as for the text stating 'falsely making evasive speech to harass others,' making a pretext of other matters is called 'false.' For example, in the fourteenth fascicle of the Mahāsāṃghika[-vinaya]: 'One asks: "Where do you come from?" He answers: "I come from the past." "Where are you going?" He answers: "I am going into the future world." Not answering properly like this is called "evasive speech."' According to the Vinaya, when Channa slighted and humiliated others and made such evasive speech, it was a duṣkṛta. The Buddha instructed the monks to perform a single-proclamation (ñatti) act, which is called [the act regarding] evasive speech. If after the proclamation is performed he offends again, he incurs a prāyaścittika offence. On another day Channa again harassed the Saṃgha: when the Saṃgha summoned him he did not come, and when they did not summon him he came; when he should speak he did not speak, and when he should not speak he spoke. Acting in this unreasonable manner is called 'harassing others.' Again [the Buddha] formulated a proclamation, called [the act regarding] harassing others; the assignment of offences follows the previous one. This is two precepts formulated together.