四分比丘戒本疏 1.41

English (machine translation) 1.41

Language: English

1.41

Question: Since in the previous hut [precept] two saṃghāvaśeṣas were combined into one rule, why not also include this saṃghāvaśeṣa to make three? Answer: The phrasing was convenient and the meanings were mutually dependent, which is why in the previous hut [precept] the two saṃghāvaśeṣas were combined into one rule. [Here,] exceeding measurements and having no measurements are mutually contradictory in meaning, and the phrasing of the legal procedure is not convenient; therefore, a separate rule was instituted.

Previous: 1.40
Next: 1.42
Up: 1

Linked texts (1)

四分比丘戒本疏 — Classical Chinese