四分律刪補隨機羯磨 1.66

1.66

（二、明受欲法。佛言：「若受欲者，受欲已便命過，若出界去，若罷道，入外道眾、別部眾，至戒場上，若明相出等七緣，若自言犯邊罪等十三難人、三舉、二滅、在空、隱沒、離見聞處，如是等通前二十八緣，並不成受欲。若至中道，若在僧中，亦爾，應更與餘者欲。」《僧祇》云五種失欲，如〈不足數〉中說。又云：「在界外受欲，持欲者出界，與欲人出界，與欲已自至僧中還出眾，第五、持欲在僧中因難驚起，無一人住者，如是等並名失欲。」《十誦》云：「與覆藏等三人失欲。」《五分》云：「與尼等四人、狂等三人，或倒出眾人，皆不成欲。」《十誦》云：「取欲、清淨人，若取時，若取竟，自言『非比丘』者，不成清淨欲。」《律》云：持欲比丘自有事起，不及詣僧，聽轉受與餘比丘，應作如是言：）

(Second, explaining the procedure for receiving consent. The Buddha said: "If a receiver of consent, having received consent, then passes away, departs beyond the boundary, renounces the way, joins an external sect or a separate division, goes onto the ordination platform, or if the dawn appears—these seven conditions; or if he declares himself to have committed pārājika, or the thirteen impediments, or the three suspensions, or the two expulsions, or is in the air, invisible, or out of sight and hearing—such conditions, together with the previous twenty-eight conditions, all invalidate the receipt of consent. If it happens on the way or within the saṃgha, it is also thus; consent must be granted anew to someone else." The Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya mentions five ways of losing consent, as explained in the section on "Not Counting toward the Quorum". It also states: "Receiving consent outside the boundary; the bearer of consent departing beyond the boundary; the grantor of consent departing beyond the boundary; having granted consent, personally coming into the saṃgha and leaving the assembly again; fifth, the bearer of consent in the saṃgha being startled and fleeing due to danger, with not a single person remaining—such cases are all called losing consent." The Daśādhyāya-vinaya states: "Granting it to the three kinds of persons undergoing concealment and the like loses consent." The Mahīśāsaka-vinaya states: "Granting it to the four kinds such as nuns, the three kinds such as madmen, or those who leave the assembly contrary [to rule]—all invalidate consent." The Daśādhyāya-vinaya states: "A person taking consent and purity who, at the time of taking or after taking, declares himself 'not a bhikṣu', does not establish pure consent." The Vinaya states: If a bhikṣu bearing consent has personal business arise and cannot reach the saṃgha in time, he is permitted to transfer and grant it to another bhikṣu, and should say as follows:)