俱舍論記 1.124

1.124

又解：是不正義，以別說故。雖說空一顯色是空界色，然別有體，《正理》不破，前解為勝。若依《法蘊足論》第十卷，二十種色外更說有空一顯色，相雜紅、紫、碧、綠、皂、褐，及餘所有眼根所見。解云：空一顯色廣如前釋。紅是赤攝。紫、碧青收。或碧是青、白。綠是黃色，或是青、黃。皂是青色。褐色不定，隨其所應，青、黃等攝。此等諸色隨其所應，餘色相雜更立異名；據本正色皆青等攝。

Another explanation says: This is an incorrect doctrine, because it is stated separately. Although it is said that the single color of the sky is the matter of the element of space, it has a distinct entity; the *Nyāyānusāra* does not refute it, and the previous explanation is superior. If one relies on the *Dharmaskandha*, fascicle 10, beyond the twenty kinds of visible form it further speaks of the single color of the sky, mixed crimson, purple, cyan, green, black, brown, and whatever else is seen by the eye faculty. Explanation: The single color of the sky is explained in detail as above. Crimson is subsumed under red. Purple and cyan are included under blue; or cyan is blue and white. Green is yellow, or blue and yellow. Black is blue. Brown is indeterminate; according to how it corresponds, it is subsumed under blue, yellow, and so forth. These various colors, according to how they correspond, are mixed with other colors to establish distinct names; based on the primary, primary colors, all are subsumed under blue, etc.