俱舍論記 10.103

10.103

「但言俱起至故彼非證」者，經部釋通。經中但言俱起受、想、思，不說受等與彼觸俱，此於我宗何違須釋？復更釋言：又於前後無間生中亦有俱聲，如契經說與慈定俱行修念覺支，此言俱者，無間俱也。說觸、受俱應知亦爾，無間說俱，故彼非證。

Regarding "It only says 'arise together' … therefore that is no proof": the Sautrāntika resolves the objection. The sūtra only says that feeling, perception, and volition arise together; it does not say that feeling and the others are together with that contact. How does this contradict our school so as to require explanation? It further explains: moreover, the word 'together' is also used for immediate sequential arising, as when a sūtra says, 'accompanied by (together with) the concentration of benevolence, one cultivates the awakening factor of mindfulness'—the word 'together' here means immediately together. The statement that contact and feeling are together should be understood likewise: they are said to be together in immediate succession. Therefore, that is no proof.