俱舍論記 10.200

10.200

「此名與義至自所分別」者，論主破此贍部林中異生名順決擇分義，亦不相應，又無文證，當知彼唯毘婆沙師自所分別。問：論主何故破婆沙評家義？解云：論主以理為宗，非以婆沙評家為量。

"This name and its meaning... are merely their own discrimination" is the author of the treatise refuting this: the name 'an ordinary person in the Jambu forest' and the meaning of 'aids to penetration' do not correspond either, and there is no textual proof; one should know that this is merely the Vaibhāṣika masters' own discrimination. Question: Why does the author of the treatise refute the opinion of the Mahāvibhāṣā evaluator? The explanation says: The author of the treatise takes reason as his authority, not the Mahāvibhāṣā evaluator as his measure.