俱舍論記 10.34

10.34

「豈不可說為餘慢等」者，論主復難。此經類性，豈不可說為餘六慢。慢等，等取過慢等五。若以慢等為類性，餘惑類故，名為類性。經部諸師不信無明別有實體，論主意朋經部故作斯難。正理論釋，意同大德。

[On the Kośa's statement:] "Could it not be said to be the other conceits, etc.?": the author of the treatise challenges again. Could not this "category" in the sūtra be said to be the other six conceits? In "conceits, etc.", "etc." includes the five such as excessive conceit (atimāna). If conceits and the like are taken to be the category, because they are of the category of the other defilements, they are called "category". The masters of the Sautrāntika do not believe that ignorance has a separate real entity; because the author of the treatise leans toward the Sautrāntika, he raises this challenge. The commentary in the Nyāyānusāra agrees with the venerable master.