俱舍論記 10.37

10.37

「色如先辨至名無色四蘊」者，答。色如先辨，謂前〈界品〉色蘊中辨，今唯辨名。前文雖亦辨餘四蘊，未說為名，故今分別。

[On the Kośa's statement:] "'Form' is as previously analyzed; ... 'name' refers to the four non-material aggregates (arūpiṇaś catvāraḥ skandhāḥ)": this is the answer. "'Form' is as previously analyzed" means it was analyzed in the previous chapter, "Analysis of the Dhātus", under the aggregate of form; now it only analyzes "name". Although the earlier text also analyzed the other four aggregates, it had not yet explained them as "name"; therefore, it distinguishes them now.