俱舍論記 16.74

16.74

「無表於此至根本業道」者，論主反責顯成業道。無表於此根本成時有何用耶？故業道成非由有用，一由加行作殺等事、二由果滿殺究竟時，爾時能暢因等起思，此表、無表俱成業道。故《婆沙》云「殺生罪由二緣得，一起加行、二果究竟。若起加行果不究竟、或果究竟不起加行，皆不得罪。若起加行果亦究竟，方得成殺罪。」

Regarding "Avijñapti here ... the fundamental path of action": The author of the treatise interrogates in return to reveal the accomplishment of the path of action. What function does avijñapti have when this fundamental [act] is accomplished? Therefore, the accomplishment of a path of action is not due to possessing function; it is due, first, to the preparatory performance of killing and so forth, and second, to the completion of the result when the killing is consummated. At that time, it can give expression to the volition of the cause-samutthāna; both this vijñapti and avijñapti accomplish the path of action. Thus the Mahāvibhāṣā states: "The fault of killing living beings is obtained through two conditions: first, initiating the preparation; second, the consummation of the result. If one initiates the preparation but the result is not consummated, or if the result is consummated without initiating the preparation, in both cases one does not incur the fault. Only if one initiates the preparation and the result is also consummated does one incur the fault of killing."