俱舍論記 17.103

17.103

「此中所說至假說等流」者，等流稍隱，故今重釋。此中所說等流果言，非越異熟及增上果。人中短壽，若望善業是異熟果，若望殺業是增上果。其等流果非越此二，於二果上據少相似假說等流。言相似者，謂斷他命令壽短促，於地獄中受異熟已，來生人中壽還短促。壽短促相似，故名相似。據此義邊，假說等流，非實等流。若實等流，自類相生。又解：此文通明十種等流。此中所說等流果言，非越異熟及增上果。若殺生等流是異熟果、增上果，餘九等流是增上果。據少相似，假說等流。言餘九等流、增上假說者，此且總相從多分說。若別細分別，於此九中身二、語四唯增上假說。若貪、瞋、非遍行邪見，望增他部貪、嗔、無明，此等皆於增上果上假說等流。若貪、瞋望增自部貪、嗔，及遍行邪見望增五部無明，即實等流，非是假說。

[On the phrase] “What is spoken of here … is metaphorically called an equal-outflow [result]” (niṣyanda-phala): because the equal-outflow [result] is somewhat hidden, it is now explained again. What is spoken of here as the term “equal-outflow result” does not exceed the retributive result (vipāka-phala) and the sovereign result (adhipati-phala). A short lifespan among humans, when viewed in relation to wholesome karma, is a retributive result; when viewed in relation to killing karma, it is a sovereign result. Its equal-outflow result does not exceed these two; upon these two results, on the basis of a slight resemblance, it is metaphorically called an equal-outflow. Saying “resemblance” means: one cut off another's life, causing their lifespan to be shortened, and having experienced retribution in hell, when coming to be born among humans, one's lifespan is again shortened. The lifespan being shortened is similar, hence it is called “resemblance.” In terms of this aspect of meaning, it is metaphorically called an equal-outflow, not a real equal-outflow. If it were a real equal-outflow, it would be produced from its own category. Another explanation: this text comprehensively explains the ten kinds of equal-outflow. What is spoken of here as the term “equal-outflow result” does not exceed the retributive result and the sovereign result. If the equal-outflow of killing is a retributive result and a sovereign result, the other nine equal-outflows are sovereign results. On the basis of a slight resemblance, they are metaphorically called equal-outflows. When it says that the other nine equal-outflows are metaphorically called sovereign [results], this is spoken generally from the perspective of the majority. If one distinguishes them in detail: among these nine, the two [courses of action] of body and the four of speech are only metaphorically called sovereign. If greed, hatred, and non-omnipresent wrong view are viewed in relation to augmenting the greed, hatred, and ignorance of other categories (nikāya), these are all metaphorically called equal-outflow upon the sovereign result. If greed and hatred are viewed in relation to augmenting greed and hatred of their own category, and omnipresent wrong view is viewed in relation to augmenting the ignorance of the five categories, these are real equal-outflows, not metaphorical.