俱舍論記 17.119

17.119

「謂餘無漏至及離繫」者，釋後兩句。是無漏故、是無記故，除異熟果。非斷道故，除離繫果。有餘三果，亦准前釋。

[On the phrase] “Namely, the remaining outflow-free … and disjunction”: this explains the last two lines. Because it is outflow-free and because it is indeterminate (avyākṛta), it excludes the retributive result. Because it is not the path of severance, it excludes the result of disjunction. It has the remaining three results, which should also be explained by analogy with the preceding.