俱舍論記 17.59

17.59

「一俱轉者至隨一究竟」者，此下別釋，明一業道與思俱轉。一俱轉者，謂離所餘身、語七種不善業道。貪等三中隨一現起，與相應思俱時轉也。若先加行遣使殺等，造六惡色業。不染心時隨一究竟，亦一業道與思俱轉。此約同時思俱轉也。《正理》破云「若先加行所造惡業，貪等餘染及不染心現在前時，隨一究竟。經主唯說不染污心，此有太減。以慢、疑等染心起時，亦有由先加行所起業道成故。又說加行造惡色業，色言太增。無色無容先加行造，不染心起業道方成。須簡別故。復如是類，例應彈斥（解云：餘染，謂慢、疑等。無色，謂貪、瞋、邪見）。」俱舍師救云：色無太增，說色業故。若不說色，即非定顯業是色故。若言加行定是色，即不須說色。亦可加行定是業，亦不須說業，業亦太增故。但應說言：若先加行所造惡，說不染心論主意別，以不染心定一俱轉。若染污心即不決定，雖慢、疑等現在前時與一俱轉，若貪、嗔等現在前時即二俱轉。以染心濫，略而不說。又此俱轉隨舉證成，非要遍說。若作此通，無勞彈斥。

"Operating together with one means: [...any one is completed]": Below this is the specific explanation, clarifying one path of action operating together with volition. 'Operating together with one' means: apart from the other seven bodily and vocal unwholesome paths of action, when any one among the three—greed and the rest—arises manifestly, it operates together with its corresponding volition. If through prior preparation (*prayoga*) one had an emissary perform killing and so forth, committing six unwholesome physical actions, and at the time of an undefiled mind any one of them reaches completion, that is also one path of action operating together with volition. This is stated in terms of operating together with volition at the same time. The *Nyāyānusāra* refutes this, saying: "If an unwholesome action committed through prior preparation reaches completion when other defiled states like greed and so forth or an undefiled mind is present, the author of the commentary only mentioned an undefiled mind; this is an under-inclusion. For when defiled minds such as pride and doubt arise, there are also paths of action arisen through prior preparation that reach completion. Moreover, stating that preparation commits unwholesome physical (*rūpa*) action is an over-inclusion of the word 'physical'. In the non-physical (*arūpa*), it is impossible for actions to be performed through prior preparation and for the path of action to only then be completed when an undefiled mind arises. A qualification was required. Other similar cases should likewise be critiqued (Explanation: 'other defilements' refers to pride, doubt, etc.; 'non-physical' refers to greed, anger, and wrong view)." The Kośa master defends: There is no over-inclusion with 'physical', because it refers to physical karma. If he had not mentioned 'physical', it would not definitely show that karma is physical. If you say that preparation is definitely physical, then there would be no need to say 'physical'; but you could equally say that preparation is definitely karma, and thus there would be no need to say 'karma', making 'karma' also an over-inclusion. Rather, one should say: with unwholesome deeds committed through prior preparation, the author's intention in specifying an undefiled mind was that an undefiled mind definitely operates together with one [path of action]. Defiled minds are not definite: although when pride, doubt, and the like are manifest they operate together with one, if greed, hatred, and the like are manifest they operate together with two. Because defiled minds are variable, they were omitted for brevity. Furthermore, this concurrent operation was merely cited as proof, without needing to be stated exhaustively. If understood in this way, there is no need for critique.