俱舍論記 18.21

18.21

「論曰至言無威故」者，釋苾芻見淨行破。大僧破，與佛敵對，自號佛故，非在家等，以彼依身無威德故。唯見行者，以惡意樂極堅深故，非愛行人，於染、淨品俱躁動故。住淨行人非犯戒者，以犯戒者言無威故。以此故知，先破僧後斷善根，要具尸羅，言威肅故。若斷善根，便捨戒故。故《婆沙》一百一十六云「問：何等種類補特伽羅破法輪僧？答：補特伽羅有二種，一者愛行、二者見行。諸見行者破法輪僧，非愛行者。以見行者所有意樂堅固猛利，於雜染，清淨品所作決定無有退轉。諸愛行者無如是事，故不能破。又唯男子破法輪僧，非諸女人，亦非扇搋、半擇迦等。所以者何？破法輪時，法爾自安立為大師。而諸女人非增上器，於大師非分，故不能破。然能廣作破僧方便，猶如麁喜苾芻尼等。諸扇搋、半擇迦、無形、二形皆是愛行，諸愛行者所有意樂不堅不猛，於染、淨品皆不決定，是故彼類不能破僧。」

"The treatise says […] because their words have no authority" explains 'a bhikṣu of pure conduct with wrong view splits [it]'. It is split by a fully ordained monk who rivals the Buddha, styling himself a Buddha; thus it is not a layperson or the like, because their physical basis lacks authority and virtue. It is solely one who follows views, because their evil intention is extremely firm and deep; it is not one who follows craving, because they are restless with respect to both defiled and pure phenomena. One who abides in pure conduct, not one who violates precepts, because the words of one who violates precepts have no authority. From this it is known that first one splits the Saṃgha and afterward cuts off roots of goodness; one must possess śīla, because one's words are authoritative and solemn. If one cuts off roots of goodness, one immediately relinquishes the precepts. Therefore the Vibhāṣā, fascicle 116, says: "Question: What class of pudgala causes a schism in the Saṃgha of the wheel of Dharma? Answer: There are two kinds of pudgalas: first, those who follow craving; second, those who follow views. Those who follow views cause a schism in the Saṃgha of the wheel of Dharma, not those who follow craving. Because the intentions of those who follow views are firm and fierce, what they do regarding defiled and pure phenomena is resolute and without regression. Those who follow craving have no such quality, so they cannot cause a schism. Furthermore, only men cause a schism in the Saṃgha of the wheel of Dharma, not women, nor ṣaṇḍhas, paṇḍakas, and the like. Why is this? When the wheel of Dharma is split, as a matter of principle, one sets oneself up as the Great Teacher. But women are not superior vessels and have no share in being the Great Teacher, so they cannot cause a schism. However, they can extensively employ expedients for schism, like the bhikṣuṇī Sthūlanandā and others. Ṣaṇḍhas, paṇḍakas, the sexless, and hermaphrodites are all followers of craving; the intentions of those who follow craving are neither firm nor fierce, and they are not resolute regarding defiled or pure phenomena; therefore, those classes cannot cause a schism."