俱舍論記 19.16

19.16

「欲貪隨眠至徵問亦爾」者，兩關徵定。為欲貪體即是隨眠，據持業釋？為是欲貪之隨眠義，據依主釋？於餘六惑義，徵問亦爾。

Regarding "The latent defilement of sensual attachment [...] the interrogation is also the same": this is an interrogation through two alternatives to settle [the definition]. Is the entity of sensual attachment itself the latent defilement, based on a karmadhāraya compound? Or is it the latent defilement of sensual attachment, based on a tatpuruṣa compound? Concerning the meaning of the remaining six afflictions, the interrogation is also the same.