俱舍論記 19.97

19.97

「有餘部說至寧起欲貪」者，敘異說。准《婆沙》、《正理》，是分別論者。於十二中八唯見斷。常、我各三，謂想、心、見。樂、淨各一，所謂見倒。四通見、修斷。樂、淨各二，所謂想、心。若謂不然，未離欲聖離樂、淨想心，寧起欲貪？以此故知，樂、淨想心亦通修斷。

"Other schools say […] how could they give rise to sensual lust?": this records an alternative view. According to the Mahāvibhāṣā and the Nyāyānusāra, these are the Vibhajyavādins. Among the twelve, eight are abandoned solely by vision: three each for permanence and self—namely, perception, mind, and view; and one each for pleasure and purity—namely, the inversion of view. Four extend across both abandonment by vision and abandonment by cultivation: two each for pleasure and purity—namely, perception and mind. If one claims it were not so, how could an ārya who is not yet free from lust give rise to sensual lust apart from perceptions and thoughts of pleasure and purity? Therefore one knows that perceptions and thoughts of pleasure and purity also extend to abandonment by cultivation.