俱舍論記 2.120

2.120

「謂身見等至明昧不同」者，答。世間諸見，謂有染、無染，或染、無染名世間，學、無學名諸見。夜分有雲喻有染，五見有漏故如夜，是煩惱故如雲。夜分無雲喻無染，正見有漏故如夜，非煩惱故如無雲。晝分有雲喻有學，正見無漏故如晝，有煩惱故如雲。晝分無雲喻無學，正見無漏故如晝，無煩惱故如無雲。餘文可知。

"Namely the view of selfhood and so forth... differing in clarity and obscurity": the answer. Mundane views refers to the soiled and unsoiled; or soiled and unsoiled are called mundane, while those of the learner (śaikṣa) and non-learner (aśaikṣa) are called the [other] views. A night with clouds is an analogy for the soiled: the five views are sāsrava, hence like night; they are defilements, hence like clouds. A night without clouds is an analogy for the unsoiled: right view is sāsrava, hence like night; it is not a defilement, hence like being without clouds. A daytime with clouds is an analogy for the learner: right view is anāsrava, hence like day; there are defilements, hence like clouds. A daytime without clouds is an analogy for the non-learner: right view is anāsrava, hence like day; there are no defilements, hence like being without clouds. The rest of the text is understandable.