俱舍論記 2.133

2.133

「傳說不能至應見障色」者，眼見家為釋反徵，解第七、第八句。識既不能觀被障色，故非能見。復反徵識見家：若識見者，識無對故，壁等不礙應見障色。

"Tradition says it cannot […] it should see obstructed forms" is the explanation and counter-inquiry by the proponent of the eye seeing, interpreting the seventh and eighth lines. Since consciousness cannot observe obstructed forms, it is not that which sees. Furthermore, they counter-inquire of the proponent of consciousness seeing: If it were consciousness that sees, because consciousness has no physical obstruction (apratigha), walls and the like would not impede it, and it should see obstructed forms.