俱舍論記 2.56

2.56

「自性分別至自當辨釋」者，指同後解，六識相應諸尋皆是自性分別。問：若體唯尋，何故《婆沙》四十二云「自性分別謂尋、伺。」解云：此論從強說，故唯說尋。婆沙強弱竝說，故通尋、伺，或略而不說，或舉初顯後，或論意不同。

Regarding "Intrinsic conceptualization... will be explained and analyzed later": This refers forward to the explanation below that all instances of reflection associated with the six consciousnesses are intrinsic conceptualization. Question: If the essence is reflection alone, why does fascicle forty-two of the *Mahāvibhāṣā* state, "Intrinsic conceptualization refers to reflection and investigation"? Explanation: This treatise speaks from the predominant perspective, hence it mentions reflection alone. The *Mahāvibhāṣā* mentions both the strong and the weak, hence it encompasses both reflection and investigation; alternatively, it is omitted for brevity; or mentioning the first illuminates the second; or the treatise masters held different viewpoints.