俱舍論記 21.3

21.3

「如是己辨至復說五種」者，此下第二明結等六門。就中，一正明結等、二諸門分別。就正明結等中，一明結等五門、二明煩惱六垢。就明結等五門中，一標章、二別釋。此即標章。即諸煩惱，一結、二縛、三隨眠、四隨煩惱、五纏，義差別故復說五種。問：漏等四門皆說并纏，結等六門但言煩惱。解云：漏等四門皆攝纏盡，故說并纏。結等六門初一攝二，第二、第三、第六不攝，第四、第五雖復攝盡，非遍諸門皆攝盡故，不說并纏。

Regarding "Having thus differentiated... five kinds are further explained": from here down is the second [section], explaining the six categories of fetters (saṃyojana) and so forth. Within this: first, properly explaining fetters and so forth; second, differentiating them through various categories. Within properly explaining fetters and so forth: first, explaining the five categories of fetters and so forth; second, explaining the six defilements (mala). Within explaining the five categories of fetters and so forth: first, stating the headings; second, explaining them separately. This is the statement of headings. That is, the defilements are further stated in five kinds due to distinctions in meaning: first, fetters (saṃyojana); second, bonds (bandhana); third, latent dispositions (anuśaya); fourth, secondary defilements (upakleśa); fifth, entanglements (paryavasthāna). Question: The four categories of outflows and so on are all said to include the entanglements, whereas the six categories of fetters and so on are merely spoken of as defilements. Explanation: The four categories of outflows and so on all subsume the entanglements completely; therefore they are spoken of as including the entanglements. Among the six categories of fetters and so on, the first subsumes two, the second, third, and sixth do not subsume them; and though the fourth and fifth subsume them completely, because they are not subsumed completely across all categories, they are not spoken of as including the entanglements.