俱舍論記 22.76

22.76

「然世尊言至非真了義」者，此下說一切有部通經部等所引三經。此即通初經也。經言諸受無非苦者，佛言我依諸行無常有為變壞，密說諸受無非是苦。若依無常，說受是苦苦、是行苦。若依變壞，說受是苦苦、是壞苦。故知此經但依行苦、壞苦二種說受是苦，不依苦苦作如是說。故《正理》云「故知此經依二苦說，不依苦苦說皆苦言。」又解：無常、變壞俱是行苦，以說諸受無非苦故。若說壞苦，唯樂受故，不通苦捨。《正理》云「通壞苦者，即是行苦中變壞無常行苦，非是三苦中壞苦。」「若由」已下，顯有三受。說受皆苦，依密意言顯有別意，非真了義說有三受。不言密意，明知了義實有三受。

As for "However, when the World-Honoured One said... is not truly definitive": from here on, the Sarvāstivāda resolves the three sūtras cited by the Sautrāntikas and others. This resolves the first sūtra. As for the sūtra stating that all feelings are nothing but suffering, the Buddha said: "Relying on the impermanence of all conditioned things and their deterioration, I spoke with implicit intent that all feelings are nothing but suffering." If one relies on impermanence, feeling is said to be the suffering of suffering and the suffering of conditioned existence; if one relies on deterioration, feeling is said to be the suffering of suffering and the suffering of deterioration. Thus one knows that this sūtra only relies on the two types—the suffering of conditioned existence and the suffering of deterioration—in stating that feeling is suffering, and does not state this relying on the suffering of suffering. Therefore the *Nyāyānusāra* says: "Thus one knows that this sūtra speaks relying on two sufferings, and does not utter the statement that all are suffering relying on the suffering of suffering." Another interpretation: Impermanence and deterioration are both the suffering of conditioned existence, since it says that all feelings are nothing but suffering. If it spoke of the suffering of deterioration, it would apply solely to pleasant feeling, and would not extend to painful and neutral [feeling]. The *Nyāyānusāra* says: "That which extends to the suffering of deterioration is precisely the suffering of conditioned existence that is deterioration and impermanence within the suffering of conditioned existence; it is not the suffering of deterioration among the three sufferings." From "If because..." downward, it shows that there are three feelings. The statement that feelings are all suffering relies on an implicit statement showing that there is another intent; it is not truly definitive. When stating that there are three feelings, it does not speak with an implicit intent; hence it is known that it is definitive that there are really three feelings.