俱舍論記 23.105

23.105

「此難不然太過失故」者，論主破。一來果等亦能任持見斷法斷，亦應見攝。若謂後位亦能任持修斷法斷無斯過者，理亦不然。既持二斷應二道攝，故不應言能持彼斷即彼道收，太過失也。《正理》意同斯解。

"This objection is incorrect, because it would entail an excessive error" is the author's refutation. The fruit of the sakṛdāgāmin and so forth can also sustain the cessation of dharmas abandoned by vision; they too would then have to be subsumed under vision. If it is claimed that in later stages one can also sustain the cessation of dharmas abandoned by cultivation and thus there is no such fault, in principle this is also not correct. Since they sustain both cessations, they would have to be subsumed under both paths; hence one should not say that being able to sustain that cessation means being included within that path, for that entails an excessive error. The intention of the Nyāyānusāra agrees with this explanation.