俱舍論記 24.10

24.10

「然復應說至或過此故」者，此釋伏難。伏難意云：頌中亦應不說後緣斷三、四品，義准亦知受三、二生。為通此伏難，故作是言。然復應說三、二生者，以有增進。斷惑時於所受生，或少三、二生，或無三、二生，或過此三、二生。如受一生或受半生名為或少，如於欲界現般涅槃名為或無，如上流受四生已上名或過此。所以頌文別說受生，不同第二成無漏根。

Regarding "However, it should also be stated … or exceeding this": this resolves an implicit objection. The implicit objection means: In the verse, one also should not state the final condition, [namely] abandoning three or four grades, because by logical implication one would also know that one undergoes three or two rebirths. To resolve this implicit objection, these words are spoken. However, that three or two rebirths should indeed be stated is because there are differences in advancement: when abandoning afflictions, with respect to the rebirths undergone, they may be fewer than three or two rebirths, there may be no three or two rebirths, or they may exceed these three or two rebirths. For example, undergoing one rebirth or undergoing half a rebirth is called "fewer"; attaining parinirvāṇa in the desire realm right in the present life is called "none"; progressing upward and undergoing four or more rebirths is called "exceeding this." Therefore, the text of the verse separately states the rebirths undergone, which is not like the second [condition of] accomplishing the anāsrava faculties.