俱舍論記 26.19

26.19

「論曰至餘則不然」者，釋上兩句。於前所說九智之中，有法、類、道及世俗智。成他心智，若知他無漏心，以法、類、道他心智知；若知他有漏心，以世俗他心智知。餘五不然，無漏他心智不知有漏心故，非苦、集智。滅是無為，故非滅智。他心智是見性，盡、無生智非見性，故非盡、無生智。

"The treatise says […] the others are not so": this explains the upper two verse-quarters. Among the nine knowledges previously mentioned, there are the knowledges of dharma, subsequent, path, and conventional. They constitute the knowledge of another's mind: if one knows another's uncontaminated mind, one knows it through the knowledge of another's mind that is dharma, subsequent, or path[-knowledge]; if one knows another's defiled mind, one knows it through the conventional knowledge of another's mind. The other five are not so: because the uncontaminated knowledge of another's mind does not know defiled minds, it is not the knowledge of suffering or origination; cessation is unconditioned, so it is not the knowledge of cessation; and because the knowledge of another's mind is of the nature of a view, whereas the knowledges of exhaustion and non-arising are not of the nature of views, it is not the knowledge of exhaustion or non-arising.