俱舍論記 26.48

26.48

「若爾有心至離貪心等」者，論主難。若爾，有心非貪對治不染污性，即是無覆無記一分善心，應許此心非名有貪心，貪不相應故。非名離貪心，不治貪故。然彼亦是有貪心，貪所繫故。等者，等取有嗔心等。若非攝者，即有十一對攝心不盡。

As for the passage from "If so, there is a mind..." to "...minds free from lust, etc.": the author of the treatise objects. If so, there is a mind that is not a counteragent to lust and is of an undefiled nature—namely, the non-obscured indeterminate and a portion of wholesome minds—which should be conceded not to be called a mind with lust, because it is unassociated with lust, and not to be called a mind free from lust, because it does not counteract lust. Yet that is also a mind with lust, because it is bound by lust. "Et cetera" includes minds with anger, etc. If they are not included, then the eleven pairs do not completely encompass all minds.