俱舍論記 26.80

26.80

「依離得說故無有過」者，論主通經。依離三界煩惱得說故，言不還墮三有受生，非唯無漏體不通彼三有所攝。彼據離得不墮三有名離貪等，我據貪不相應名離貪等，各據一義，故無有失。

Regarding “Because it is spoken with reference to abandoning acquisitions, there is no fault”: this is the author of the treatise resolving the sūtra. It is spoken with reference to abandoning the acquisitions of afflictions of the three realms, and therefore says that one does not fall back into the three realms of existence to take rebirth; it does not mean that the substance of what is free from lust is exclusively anāsrava and cannot be subsumed under the three realms of existence. That [sūtra] defines being free from lust and so on in terms of abandoning acquisitions and not falling into the three realms of existence; I define being free from lust and so on in terms of not being associated with lust. Each is based on one meaning, so there is no fault.