俱舍論記 27.112

27.112

「此三皆名至非無學故」者，釋第三句。此三皆名無學明者，俱在無學身中起故。於中最後漏盡智明，或六智性、或十智性，容真無學通無漏故。餘二假說名為無學，體唯非學非無學故。故《正理》云「由此最後得無學名，自性、相續皆無學故。前之二種得無學名，但由相續，不由自性。」

On "All three are called [aśaikṣa vidyās] ... because [they are] not aśaikṣa": this explains the third line. These three are all called the vidyās of an aśaikṣa because they all arise within the continuum of an aśaikṣa. Among them, the final one, the vidyā of the knowledge of the destruction of contaminants, has the nature of either six knowledges or ten knowledges, and allows of being truly aśaikṣa since it extends to the anāsrava. The other two are only metaphorically called aśaikṣa, because their intrinsic nature is solely neither-śaikṣa-nor-aśaikṣa. Therefore, the Nyāyānusāra states: "This final one receives the name aśaikṣa because both its intrinsic nature and continuum are aśaikṣa. The preceding two receive the name aśaikṣa solely on account of the continuum, not on account of their intrinsic nature."