俱舍論記 29.110

29.110

「若於一時至與法一異」者，犢子部答。若於一時眼識識色，因茲知有我，言是某甲，說此名為眼識所識，而不可說與色一、異。乃至意識知法等，准此可知。

As for 'If at one time... identical to or distinct from mental objects': The Vātsīputrīya answers: If at one time eye-consciousness cognizes form, and based on this one knows that the self exists, saying 'this is so-and-so', this is said to be cognized by eye-consciousness, yet it cannot be expressed as identical to or distinct from form. And so on up to mental consciousness knowing mental objects, which should be understood by analogy.