俱舍論記 4.116

4.116

「何等惡作說名為善」者，問。「謂於善惡至二處而起」者，答。謂於善不作、於惡作心追悔性，名善惡作。若與此善惡作相違，名不善惡作。謂於善作、於惡不作心追悔性。此善、不善二種惡作，各依善、惡二處而起。故《婆沙》三十七云「此中惡作總有四句：一有惡作是善，於不善處起。二有惡作是不善，於善處起。三有惡作是善，於善處起。四有惡作是不善，於不善處起。」

"What kind of remorse is called good?" introduces the question. "It means [remorse arises] with respect to the good and the bad [...] it arises with respect to the two conditions" is the answer. That is to say, when the mind repents of not having done good and having done evil, it is called good remorse. If it is contrary to this good remorse, it is called unwholesome remorse; that is, when the mind repents of having done good and not having done evil. These two kinds of remorse, wholesome and unwholesome, each arise based on the two conditions of good and evil. Hence the Mahāvibhāṣā, fascicle thirty-seven, states: "Here, remorse has four propositions in total: 1. Remorse that is wholesome, arising with respect to what is unwholesome. 2. Remorse that is unwholesome, arising with respect to what is wholesome. 3. Remorse that is wholesome, arising with respect to what is wholesome. 4. Remorse that is unwholesome, arising with respect to what is unwholesome."