俱舍論記 5.202

5.202

「又為成立至言何得成」者，上來破生覺，此破第六轉。又為成立第六轉言，應執別有色之聚性，然離色外無別聚性。又如說言色之自性，離色之外無別自性，此第六轉言何得成？准此文難，第六轉聲義說相屬，非要異體相繫屬也。

"Furthermore, in order to establish [...] how could the expression be established?": The above refuted the cognition of arising; this refutes the sixth case (genitive). Furthermore, in order to establish expressions in the sixth case, one would have to posit that there is a distinct aggregation-ness of form, yet apart from form there is no distinct aggregation-ness. Also, as in the expression 'the intrinsic nature of form,' apart from form there is no distinct intrinsic nature; how then could this expression in the sixth case be established? Judging by this textual objection, words in the sixth case express relationship metaphorically/figuratively; they do not necessarily connect mutually distinct entities.