俱舍論記 5.206

5.206

「諸行名生至一無生用」者，經部解。諸行名生，由本無今有。無為體常，有何得言生？又如汝宗，法爾不說一切法有生，有為有生、無為無生。如是應許我非一切法皆可生，有為可生、無為不可生。又如汝宗，諸有為法同有生相，而許因緣望有為法，或於一類有生功能應令生故，或於一類無生功能不令生故，以諸因緣相望各別。如是應許我一切有為及無為法同無生相，而諸因緣望彼二法，於有為有生用，於無為無生用。正理救意：眼等雖從業生，而別有四大生，何妨有為雖從因緣生而別有生相？俱舍師破云：經部生無體，可藉因緣生；汝宗生有體，應不藉因緣。

"Conditioned forces are called 'arisen' [...] have no function of causing to arise in the other": The Sautrāntika explains: Conditioned forces are called 'arisen' because they are previously nonexistent and now existing. The unconditioned is permanent in entity; how could it be said to arise? Furthermore, just as in your school, by the nature of things it is not said that all dharmas have arising—conditioned things have arising, while unconditioned things do not have arising—in the same way you should grant my view that not all dharmas can arise: conditioned things can arise, while unconditioned things cannot arise. Furthermore, just as in your school all conditioned dharmas equally have the characteristic of arising, yet you allow that causes and conditions, with respect to conditioned dharmas, have the functional capacity of arising with respect to one class so that they cause it to arise, and have no functional capacity of arising with respect to another class so that they do not cause it to arise, because the various causes and conditions differ in relation to one another; in the same way, you should grant my view that all conditioned and unconditioned dharmas equally lack the characteristic of arising, yet the various causes and conditions, with respect to those two dharmas, have an operative function of arising regarding the conditioned, and have no operative function of arising regarding the unconditioned. The intention of the Nyāyānusāra's rescue is: although the eye and so forth arise from karma, they additionally have the great elements to arise from; what prevents conditioned things, although arising from causes and conditions, from having a distinct characteristic of arising? The Kośa master refutes this, saying: In the Sautrāntika view, arising has no entity, so it can depend on causes and conditions to arise; in your school, arising has an entity, so it should not depend on causes and conditions.