俱舍論記 5.214
俱舍論記 5.214
- Language
- Classical Chinese
5.214
豈「不此字亦書分名」者，問。豈不此阿哀等字，亦能詮彼紙上墨書分，亦是紙上墨書分名。是即亦有詮表，應亦是名。如何言無詮表？
"Is not this phoneme also the designation of written strokes?" is a question. Would not these phonemes such as a and ā also denote the written ink strokes on paper, and also be the designations of the written ink strokes on paper? If so, they would also possess denotation, and should also be words. Why say that they lack denotation?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation