俱舍論記 6.192

6.192

「聖見有無至義有何違」者，經部解。聖見有無皆無顛倒，謂聖見苦名有，見苦非有名無，此於聖諦義有何違？又解：聖見苦、集、道有，見滅是無，皆無顛倒。此是總標，「謂」下別釋。謂聖於苦見唯是苦，於苦非有見唯非有，此於聖諦義有何違？於別釋中，但言苦、滅，不言集、道。

On "The noble one sees existence and non-existence [up to] what contradiction is there with the meaning?": the Sautrāntika explains. The noble one's vision of existence and non-existence is in both cases non-erroneous: that is, the noble one's seeing suffering is called [seeing] existence, and seeing the non-existence of suffering is called [seeing] non-existence; what contradiction does this have with the meaning of the noble truths? Another explanation: the noble one sees suffering, origination, and the path as existent, and sees cessation as non-existent, both being non-erroneous. This is the general statement; the text following "that is" is the specific explanation: that is, with respect to suffering, the noble one sees it solely as suffering; with respect to the non-existence of suffering, sees it solely as non-existent; what contradiction does this have with the meaning of the noble truths? In the specific explanation, he mentions only suffering and cessation, and does not mention origination and the path.