俱舍論記 6.204

6.204

「何因此滅定屬此得」者，經部難。若滅體別，非即事無。滅體眾多，得亦非一。何因此滅定屬此得，而言約得說屬事耶？

Regarding "Why must this cessation necessarily belong to this acquisition?": the Sautrāntika objects. If the entity of cessation is distinct and is not simply the non-existence of the thing, entities of cessation are numerous and acquisitions are also not single. Why must this cessation necessarily belong to this acquisition, such that you say belonging to the thing is spoken of in terms of acquisition?