俱舍論記 6.76

6.76

「若爾異熟因至無前後故」者，此下義當第二互為因果難，將明問起。若爾，異熟因應未來非有，不應異熟果因前及俱故，以未來世法無前後故。

"If so, the maturation cause ... because there is no before-and-after": Below this, the meaning corresponds to the second objection of mutual causation, raising a question to initiate the explanation: If so, the maturation cause should not exist in the future, because the maturation fruit cannot precede or be simultaneous with its cause, since dharmas in the future realm have no before-and-after.