俱舍論記 7.70

7.70

「若言自在至無差別故」者，牒轉計破。若言自在欲雖頓生，而諸世間不俱起者，由隨自在希望境時欲即所生故，今彼受用。理亦不然。彼自在欲前後兩位無差別故，應當一時頓生諸法。前位之時應亦能生，無差別故，猶如後位。後位之時應不能生，無差別故，猶如前位。

"If it is said that Īśvara... up to ...because there is no difference": cites the modified position and refutes it. If it is said that although Īśvara's desire arises all at once, the various worlds do not arise together because, following the time when Īśvara wishes for the object, the desire is that which produces it, now causing them to experience it—this is also unreasonable. Because that desire of Īśvara has no difference between its earlier and later phases, it should produce all dharmas all at once simultaneously. At the time of the earlier phase, it should also be capable of producing them, because there is no difference, just like the later phase. At the time of the later phase, it should be unable to produce them, because there is no difference, just like the earlier phase.