俱舍論記 8.149

8.149

「豈不現見至何妨續生」者，無中有家救。從質像生，中間雖間，然得續生。從死至生中間雖間，何妨續生？即顯論主因不定過。為如種果，相續生故，死生中間必有連續；為如質像，相續生故，死生中間而無連續。

"Is it not visibly seen [...] what prevents it from arising in continuity?": the proponent of no intermediate existence rescues his position. A reflection arises from an original object (*bimba*); though there is an interval in between, it nevertheless arises in continuity. From death to birth, although there is an interval in between, what prevents it from arising in continuity? This shows the fallacy of inconclusiveness (*anaikāntika*) in the author's reason: is it like a seed and a fruit, where because of arising in continuity there must be an unbroken connection between death and birth; or is it like an original object and a reflection, where because of arising in continuity there is no unbroken connection between death and birth?