俱舍論記 8.85

8.85

「經部師說至得想異名」者，經部引經釋第三識住名想異，如文可知。《正理》難意：第三定天見下水災，新、舊生天有怖、不怖想，應名想異。若俱舍師救：第二定中喜擾動故，見下火災怖、不怖想。第三定中樂凝靜故，雖見水災而不生怖，由不怖想言想一。

"The Sautrāntika masters say […] obtain the name 'different in ideation'": the Sautrāntikas cite a sūtra to explain the third abode of consciousness being named 'different in ideation', as can be understood from the text. The intention of the *Nyāyānusāra*'s objection is: When the gods of the third dhyāna see the water disaster below, newly born and previously born gods have ideations of fear and non-fear, so they should be called 'different in ideation'. If the Kośa master defends: In the second dhyāna, because joy is agitating, when they see the fire disaster below they have ideations of fear and non-fear; in the third dhyāna, because pleasure is tranquil and stable, though they see the water disaster they do not give rise to fear, and due to the ideation of non-fear they are said to be 'one in ideation'.