俱舍論記 9.142

9.142

「此非理作意至為緣起支」者，論主破。若言由此非理作意與彼四取煩惱相應即取支攝，愛與無明亦四取相應，亦應四取攝，應不別立餘緣起支。設許取支攝，云何能證為無明因？汝若言但取支攝即證因果，愛與無明亦四取攝，證成因果，應不別立愛無明支。

Regarding "This inappropriate attention [...] as a link of dependent origination": the author of the treatise refutes it. If you say that because this inappropriate attention is associated with those afflictions of the four graspings, it is subsumed under the link of grasping, then craving and ignorance are also associated with the four graspings, so they should also be subsumed under grasping and should not be separately established as other links of dependent origination. Even granting that it is subsumed under the link of grasping, how can that prove it to be the cause of ignorance? If you say that merely being subsumed under the link of grasping proves cause and effect, then craving and ignorance are also subsumed under grasping and would prove cause and effect, so the links of craving and ignorance should not be separately established.