俱舍論記 9.55

9.55

「以卵生者至入胎無失」者，答。入胎從初名說，卵生據當以論。如言造作有為，造作是現業，有為是當果。現造業時言當果者，從當名說。正煮米時言煮飯者，從當名說。正磨麥時言磨[麩-夫+少]者，亦從當名說。故說卵生入胎無失。

[On the passage] 'Because egg-born beings... entering the womb has no fault': the answer. Entering the womb is stated based on the initial name, while egg-born is discussed based on what will come later. Just as saying 'making the conditioned': making is present action, while the conditioned is the future result. When currently performing karma, to mention the future result is naming it from what is to come. When boiling rice, to say 'boiling cooked rice' is naming it from what is to come. When grinding wheat, to say 'grinding flour' is also naming it from what is to come. Therefore, saying that the egg-born enters the womb has no fault.