俱舍論記 9.67

9.67

「內用士夫至唯除法假」者，論主破。內用士夫我，此定非有。如色等有體，現量可知；如眼等有用，比量可知。不可得故。於聖教中，世尊復云：「有業有異熟，作者實我不可得故。」謂能捨此前蘊及能續餘後蘊，但是法假，此之法假非所遮遣。

"An internal agent-person […] only excepting a nominal designation based on dharmas": the treatise author refutes it. Such an internal agent-person or self is definitely non-existent. Like form and the like, which possess substantial entity and can be known by direct perception; or like the eye and the like, which possess function and can be known by inference—[a self] is unapprehendable. In the sacred teaching, the World-Honoured One also said: "Karma exists and fruition exists, but an agent, a real self, is unapprehendable." Being able to abandon the prior aggregates and being able to continue the subsequent aggregates is merely a nominal designation based on dharmas; such a nominal designation based on dharmas is not what is refuted.