俱舍論疏 1.157

1.157

論「或有色處至身表業性」，第二句也。身表業色雖起之時，與舊相續顯色同聚，然不必俱、初起、息滅與顯異故。初起無新顯色，息滅古顯相續故。《正理論》云「所說身表是形差別，其理極成。謂從加行心所生不住等流大種果別類形色，不待餘顯色為眼識生因，能蔽異熟生所長養形色，如是形色名為身表。」

The treatise says: "Or there is a sense-field of form ... the nature of bodily action of intimation." This is the second alternative. Although the matter of bodily intimation at the time of arising aggregates together with the color of the former continuum, they are not necessarily co-present, because its initial arising and its cessation are distinct from color. At its initial arising there is no new color, and at its cessation the former color continues. The *Nyāyānusāra* says: "That the stated bodily intimation is a distinction of configuration is a principle firmly established. That is, a distinct configuration, an effect of unstable outflowing great elements produced from a preparatory mind, which does not depend on other color as a cause for the arising of visual consciousness, and is capable of obscuring the configuration nurtured by maturation-born [elements]—such a configuration is called bodily intimation."