俱舍論疏 1.161

1.161

論「由於此中至非有境義」，論主取經部意答也。此中實是一色生顯、形二智故，名亦顯亦形。所以得知不依有部答者？《正理論》云「經主前難：如何一事具有二體者，此難不成，非所許故。」（述曰：形微、顯微體各別故，不許一事有顯形也。）

The treatise says: "Because here ... it does not mean there is an [external] object." The author of the treatise answers by adopting the Sautrāntika view. Here, it is genuinely one matter giving rise to two cognitions—of color and configuration; therefore it is called both color and configuration. How is it known that this is not answered according to the Sarvāstivāda? The *Nyāyānusāra* says: "The author of the sūtras previously objected: 'How can one entity possess two essences?' This objection is unfounded, for it is not accepted." (The commentary states: "Because configuration-atoms and color-atoms are distinct in essence, it is not accepted that one entity has both color and configuration.")