俱舍論疏 1.271

1.271

論「如是一切至說名色蘊」，第二明聚也。此是名略，非體略也。三世等色不可略為一聚，但名中總略為一聚也。《婆沙論》七十四云「問：過去、未來、現在諸色可略聚耶？答：雖不可略聚其體，而可得略聚其名。乃至識蘊應知亦爾。」《雜心論》云「名略，非體也。」《婆沙》七十四云「餘經復說：云何色蘊諸所有色，若過去、若未來、若現在，若內、若外，若麁、若細，若劣、若勝，若遠、若近，如是一切略為一聚說名色蘊，乃至識蘊廣說亦爾。此為遮止外道所說。謂佛在世有出家外道，名為杖髻，撥無過去未來。為遮彼意故，世尊說諸所有色，若過去、若未來、若現在，乃至廣說。」《阿毘達磨》作是說言「云何色蘊？謂十色處及法處所攝色，是名色蘊。此為遮止譬喻者說，謂譬喻者撥無法處所攝諸色。故此尊者法救亦言：諸所有色，皆五識身所依所緣，如何是色非五識身所依所緣？為遮彼意故作是說：云何色蘊？謂十色處、法處所攝色。」

The treatise says: "All these together... is called the aggregate of form." This is the second, clarifying the collection. This is an abbreviation of name, not an abbreviation of substance. The forms of the three times and so forth cannot be abbreviated into a single substantial collection; they are only comprehensively abbreviated into a single collection within their name. Fascicle 74 of the *Vibhāṣā* says: "Question: Can past, future, and present forms be abbreviated into a collection? Answer: Although their substances cannot be abbreviated into a collection, their names can be abbreviated into a collection. Up to the aggregate of consciousness, it should be known that it is also like this." The *Saṃyuktābhidharmahṛdaya* says: "It is an abbreviation of name, not of substance." Fascicle 74 of the *Vibhāṣā* says: "Another sūtra further states: What is the aggregate of form? All forms whatsoever, whether past, whether future, whether present, whether internal, whether external, whether coarse, whether fine, whether inferior, whether superior, whether far, whether near—all these together are abbreviated into a single collection and called the aggregate of form; up to the aggregate of consciousness, it is also extensively explained in this way. This is to refute what is stated by non-Buddhists. That is, when the Buddha was in the world, there was a renunciant non-Buddhist named Staff-Topknot (*Yaṣṭika*?) who denied the past and future. To refute his view, the World-Honoured One spoke of 'all forms whatsoever, whether past, whether future, whether present', up to the extensive explanation." The *Abhidharma* states as follows: "What is the aggregate of form? It refers to the ten form bases and the form subsumed by the base of phenomena; this is called the aggregate of form. This is to refute the assertion of the Dārṣṭāntikas. That is, the Dārṣṭāntikas deny that there are any forms subsumed by the base of phenomena. Hence this Venerable Dharmatrāta also said: All forms whatsoever are the supports and objective referents of the five consciousness-bodies; how could there be a form that is not the support and objective referent of the five consciousness-bodies? To refute their view, it was stated: What is the aggregate of form? It refers to the ten form bases and the form subsumed by the base of phenomena."