俱舍論疏 1.290

1.290

論「若言聚義至如聚如我」，自下第四問答分別。薩婆多部三科總實；經部蘊、處是假，唯界是實。論主蘊假，處、界是實。立量破有部云：色等五蘊必定是假。多實成故。猶如聚、我。

The treatise says: "If you say that the meaning of collection... like a heap or a self." Below is the fourth part, analysis through questions and answers. The Sarvāstivāda school holds that all three classifications are real; the Sautrāntikas hold that aggregates and bases are nominal, and only realms are real. The author of the treatise holds that aggregates are nominal, while bases and realms are real. He sets up an inference to refute the Sarvāstivādins, saying: The five aggregates of form and so forth are definitely nominal; because they are composed of multiple real things; like a heap or a self.