俱舍論疏 11.82

11.82

論「唯一日月至餘例應知」，述用廣狹。「北洲夜半東洲日沒南洲日中西洲日出」者，此據一時而論，非全盡理。若不爾者，北洲夜半、南洲日中，理且可然。東洲日沒當妙高山東南角，南洲日中當妙高山正南，西方日出當妙高山西南，豈全定也。

The treatise says: "Only one sun and moon... the rest should be understood accordingly." This states the scope of their function. As for "midnight in Uttarakuru, sunset in Pūrvavideha, midday in Jambudvīpa, sunrise in Aparagodānīya," this is discussed based on a single point in time and does not exhaust the full principle. Were it not so, midnight in Uttarakuru and midday in Jambudvīpa would still be plausible in principle; but sunset in Pūrvavideha corresponds to the southeast corner of Mount Meru, midday in Jambudvīpa corresponds directly south of Mount Meru, and sunrise in Aparagodānīya corresponds to the southwest of Mount Meru—how could this be completely fixed?