俱舍論疏 13.114

13.114

論「非但由此至成無間業」，論主破云：非但由思作已殺等解即成業道，實非殺母作殺母解應成無間。此既不成，如何但由其思即成業道？

The treatise says: "It is not merely through this... constituting karma of immediate retribution." The author of the treatise refutes [this], saying: It is not merely through intention with the conception that one has killed or the like that a path of action is constituted; if one has not actually killed one's mother but conceives that one has killed one's mother, this should [absurdly] constitute karma of immediate retribution. Since this does not constitute it, how could a path of action be constituted merely through that intention?