俱舍論疏 14.112

14.112

論「雖無對師至故不立有」，通難。由起畢竟壞善意樂，故得盡壽不律儀；雖起暫時壞善意樂，不對師故不得日夜不律儀也。雖暫時壞惡意樂心，以對師受得近住戒；若有對師受不律儀，亦令得惡戒，然無受者故不立有。

The treatise says: "Although there is no [reception] before a teacher ... therefore its existence is not posited." Resolving the objection: By giving rise to a definitive intention to destroy the good, one obtains the lifetime non-restraint. Although one may give rise to a temporary intention to destroy the good, because it is not before a teacher, one does not obtain day-and-night non-restraint. Although one has an intention temporarily abandoning evil, because one receives them before a teacher, one obtains the upavāsa precepts; if one were to receive non-restraint before a teacher, it would also cause one to obtain evil precepts, but since no one receives them in this way, its existence is not posited.