俱舍論疏 17.104

17.104

論「此十所得增上果者至增上果別」，第三明增上果。由殺生故光澤鮮少，壞他光澤故。不與取故，多遭霜、雹（損他物故）。欲邪行故，多諸塵埃（污他名故）。虛誑語故，多諸臭穢（誑他人，不欲聞故。應更檢）。離間語故，所居險曲（親番往來難故）。麁惡語故，田多荊棘等（語傷人等故）。雜穢語故，時儀變改（是說非故）。貪故果少（欲減他物故），嗔故果辣（辛辣如嗔故），邪見故果少或無（輕即果少、重即果無）。

The passage of the śāstra from "The dominant fruits obtained from these ten" up to "the distinction of the dominant fruits" is the third part, explaining the dominant fruit. Due to killing, luster is scarce, because one destroyed the luster of others. Due to taking what is not given, there is much frost and hail (because one harmed others' goods). Due to sexual misconduct, there is much dust and dirt (because one defiled another's reputation). Due to false speech, there is much foul stench (because one deceived others and they do not wish to hear it; this should be checked further). Due to divisive speech, one's dwelling is treacherous and winding (because travel among relatives is difficult). Due to harsh speech, fields have many thorns, etc. (because one's speech wounded others, etc.). Due to frivolous talk, the seasons and norms change (because one stated what is not so). Due to covetousness, fruits are few (because one desired to diminish others' property). Due to malice, fruits are pungent (hot and pungent like malice). Due to wrong view, fruits are few or non-existent (if light, fruits are few; if heavy, fruits are non-existent).